Discover the Latest Scientific Breakthrough That's Shocking the Medical World!
Backed by New Peer-Reviewed Human Trial Studies on Diet & Health
Dr. Paul Arciero
Dr. Paul Arciero, one of the top nutritional researchers in the world for nearly 40 years, warns against weight loss protocols that are lacking peer-reviewed human trial science. He proves the R2M Protocol in his recent peer-reviewed human trials studies, is incredibly effective as a weight loss solution. These studies are compared to previous results in both weight loss and improved health from nearly four decades of analysis.
“I have been looking for the magic bullet for weight loss and to maximize our quality-of-life potential for 40 years, and now I have found it.”
He exclusively recommends the R2M Protocol, which incorporates Intermittent Nutritional Fasting® (not intermittent fasting, or fasting) and Protein Pacing®. These elements have been proven to be safe and effective in his published peer-reviewed human trial studies that analyzed the R2M Protocol’s Intermittent Nutritional Fasting® and Protein Pacing®.
60 minutes that will change your Life
Peter Greenlaw
Peter Greenlaw, a researcher of researchers, has shared valuable insights through co-authored books and over 1,500 global lectures. He introduced The TDOS Syndrome®, linking toxicity, nutritional deficiency, overweight, and stress to energy, sleep, stress, and weight gain.
“You do not know how bad you feel until you realize how good you can feel.”
The New Health Conversation® features health scientists, medical experts, and the top nutritional researchers, in the world. He is a frequent guest on various media platforms, including ABC Windy City Live and Fox Los Angeles. He has also appeared 20 times on PBS.
Studies by Dr. Arciero & Others
Nutrition Journal study compared 2 days of intermittent nutritional fasting using the r2m protocol to 1 day of Intermittent nutritional fasting.
- Participants following 2 days of Intermittent Fast Days (detox days) had 34% more weight loss than 1 day of detox.
- Participants following the 2 days of detox lost 67% more in their waist circumference.
- Both 2 days and 1 day of detox using the R2M protocol had a 2% increase in lean body mass.
- Both groups saw a 17% reduction in cholesterol, a 12% drop in LDL-C (bad cholesterol), and a 15% reduction in triglycerides (blood fat).
- There was an overall 44% reduction in hunger for both groups, with those completing 2 days of detox seeing a 40% greater reduction than the 1 day group
Comparison of 8 weeks of protein pacing with nutritional fasting using the r2m protocol versus heart healthy Mediterranean-style diet on body composition and cardio-metabolic health outcomes (NO exercise). Groups were matched for total calorie intake and physical expenditure. The r2m protocol results in comparison to the Mediterranean Diet.
- 80% greater weight loss with the R2M protocol
- 78% greater fat loss with the R2M protocol
- 136% greater visceral fat loss with the R2M protocol
- 17-fold greater decrease in desire to eat with the R2M protocol
- 100% increase in proportion of lean body mass with the R2M protocol
- 91% reduction in sugar intake with the R2M protocol
- 6-fold increase in dietary fiber with the R2M protocol
Comparison of 8 weeks of protein pacing with nutritional fasting (r2m protocol) versus the heart-healthy Mediterranean-style )diet on gut microbiome health outcomes. Both groups were matched for total calorie intake and physical expenditure.
- 80% greater total and visceral fat loss in the R2M protocol versus the Mediterranean Diet
- 25% greater gut microbial diversity in the R2M protocol than the Mediterranean Diet
- 55% reduction in GI symptoms with the R2M protocol versus the Mediterranean Diet
- The R2M protocol featured a participant with a 105 lbs. weight loss in 120 days, who maintained the loss for 1 year, significantly remodeled his gut microbiome in a healthier way, and maintained the same gut microbiome a year later.
Comparable Studies
The comparison between the R2M protocol studies published in the Nutrition Journal, Obesity Journal, and Nature Communications, compared to the meta-analysis from the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and the New England Journal of Medicine studies on well-known diets, highlights significant differences in outcomes regarding weight loss and improvements in various health markers.
Discover a 12 Month Study analyzing all diets by name. The results were very poor with an average weight loss on all diets of only 16 lbs. in a year. Note: The Journal of The American Medical Association Study was not conducted by Dr. Arciero. It was done by the American Journal of Medicine.
This was a 12-month study broken into two groups. Group #1 reduced calories (as in most traditional diets) Group # 2 did Time-Restricted Eating where they did not eat for 16 hours and ate in an 8-hour window. This is known as the 16-8 diet.
- Group # 1 17.6 Lbs. in a year
- Group #2 13.86 Lbs. in a year
- The Study stated: Both the time-restricted-eating group # 2 and Group # 1 the daily-calorie-restriction diets led to the loss of lean muscle mass, abdominal visceral fat, and liver fat; subcutaneous fat, and liver fat; there was no differences between the groups.
Results after 68 weeks were as follows:
- 34 lbs. weight reduction, but the weight loss was 40% lean muscle mass or 13.6 lbs
- The loss of lean muscle slows down metabolism (slowing of metabolism leads to rapid weight gain once any diet is stopped) and muscle loss also negatively affects the immune system.
Breakdown of studies findings:
1. Weight loss
JAMA Study: Average weight loss of 16 lbs over 12 months across 7,286 people in 48 different diet programs.
Nutrition Journal and Obesity Journal (r2m Protocol): Average weight loss of 16 lbs in just 30 days, showing a weight loss rate 12 times faster than those in the JAMA study.
2. Lean Muscle Mass
r2m Protocol: Participants gained 6-9% lean muscle mass despite not exercising.
JAMA Study: Participants generally lost lean muscle mass on other diet programs.
3. Metabolic Syndrome Factors
r2m Protocol: Significant reductions in all five co-factors of Metabolic Syndrome:
- Blood sugar reduced by 6.2%
- Insulin reduced by 41%
- Cholesterol reduced by 15%
- LDL cholesterol reduced by 13%
- Triglycerides reduced by 24%
- Visceral fat reduced by 33% in 8 weeks
JAMA Study: No significant reductions reported in these metabolic factors.
4. Inflammation
r2m Protocol: Inflammation reduced by 25%.
JAMA Study: No reduction in inflammation reported.
5. Waist Circumference
r2m Protocol: Average reduction of 4 inches in waist circumference.
6. Comparative Results with Heart Healthy Diet (Mediterranean Diet)
r2m Protocol (Obesity Journal): Participants lost 68% more weight in 8 weeks compared to those on the Heart Healthy Diet in the New England Journal of Medicine study. programs.
7. Toxicity
r2m Protocol: Visceral fat (toxic fat) reduced by 33% in 8 weeks.
JAMA Study: No reduction in visceral fat or other toxins.
8. Gut Microbiome - Nature Communications study (r2m protocol compared to Mediterranean Diet)
- 80% greater total and visceral fat loss in the r2m protocol compared to Mediterranean diet
- 25% greater gut microbial diversity in IF-P than Mediterranean diet
- 55% reduction in GI symptoms in IF-P than Mediterranean diet
Conclusion
The studies on the R2M protocol, as published in the Nutrition Journal, Obesity Journal, and Nature Communications, indicate a significantly more effective approach to weight loss and overall health improvement compared to the diets reviewed in the JAMA meta-analysis and the studies in the New England Journal of Medicine on other well-known diets. The rapid weight loss, muscle gain, and comprehensive metabolic improvements suggest that the r2m protocol is a superior method for achieving and maintaining a healthy weight and metabolic profile.